xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS patch for 2.4.9-e.10.10summit

To: Ray Muno <muno@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS patch for 2.4.9-e.10.10summit
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:52:25 +0000
Cc: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vangel Bojaxhi <vbojaxhi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, al Richings <ARichings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20030211164747.GA26434@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from muno@xxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:47:49AM -0600
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20030211083929.00ae8830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5.1.0.14.2.20030211083929.00ae8830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20030211173109.03020a28@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030211164747.GA26434@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:47:49AM -0600, Ray Muno wrote:
> I went to a presentation by SGI about their new Altix Itanium Linux 
> machines.  They claimed that they are running Red Hat Advanced Server
> with XFS.

That's wrong.  Do you now the name of that marketing person?

p.s. and even if it was running RH AS, the IA64 version of RH AS is
based on linux 2.4.18 which makes patching in XFS a lot easier.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>