| To: | lord@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: U320 Large Array Performance |
| From: | "Rick Smith" <rgsmith72@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 05 Feb 2003 12:33:40 -0800 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Steve,After examining the output of the xfs_bmap that I sent you it looks like each file has a different allocation group for the 15 disk case. With 14 disks (73GB each) there are 240 allocation groups when I build the filesystem and I get 257 allocation groups when I use 15 disks. Could there be an issue when exceeding 256 allocation groups that affects the mapping of files to allocation groups? Rick From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> To: Rick Smith <rgsmith72@xxxxxxxxxxx> CC: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: U320 Large Array Performance Date: 05 Feb 2003 12:02:08 -0600 On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 16:47, Rick Smith wrote: > Steve,> Here is the output from xfs_info, please excuse the formatting. I am using > a chunk size of 4K in the raid. Larger sizes seem to degrade performance.> Thanks for your help. > Can you do one more thing for me, with these configurations send me the xfs_bmap -v output for a file on each filesystem. Thanks, Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx _________________________________________________________________MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Need patch for 2.4.21, Paul Blazejowski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: U320 Large Array Performance, Rick Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: U320 Large Array Performance, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: U320 Large Array Performance, Rick Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |