xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: U320 Large Array Performance

To: lord@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: U320 Large Array Performance
From: "Rick Smith" <rgsmith72@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 12:33:40 -0800
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Steve,
After examining the output of the xfs_bmap that I sent you it looks like each file has a different allocation group for the 15 disk case. With 14 disks (73GB each) there are 240 allocation groups when I build the filesystem and I get 257 allocation groups when I use 15 disks. Could there be an issue when exceeding 256 allocation groups that affects the mapping of files to allocation groups?

Rick

From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
To: Rick Smith <rgsmith72@xxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: U320 Large Array Performance
Date: 05 Feb 2003 12:02:08 -0600

On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 16:47, Rick Smith wrote:
> Steve,
> Here is the output from xfs_info, please excuse the formatting. I am using > a chunk size of 4K in the raid. Larger sizes seem to degrade performance.
> Thanks for your help.
>

Can you do one more thing for me, with these configurations send me the
xfs_bmap -v output for a file on each filesystem.

Thanks,

Steve

--

Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx


_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>