On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 09:33, Miro, Felix wrote:
> Thanks. What is the patch marked preempt about? Should I be using that one?
>
> Regards,
> Felix
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Blazejowski [mailto:paulb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:56 AM
> To: Miro, Felix
> Cc: linux-xfs
> Subject: Re: Need patch for 2.4.21
>
>
> On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 02:51, Paul Blazejowski wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 14:42, Miro, Felix wrote:
> >
> > > I'm having difficulty applying the 2.4.19 patch against 2.4.21 source.
> Our
> > > product offering is going to be based on 2.4.21. We would like to
> include
> > > XFS in our linux offering. Can you supply an XFS patch based on 2.4.21?
> > > The problem I'm having is with files that have significant changes in
> 2.4.21
> > > vs 2.4.19. The 2.4.19 patch doesn't relate at all in those cases.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Felix Miro
> > >
> >
> > You mean the latest preXX? because there is no 2.4.21 just yet...
> >
> > I have made a diff against the 2.4.21-pre4 source from kernel.org.
> > It's from today's CVS but without the kdb v3.0 commits Keith Ownes just
> > made...to xfs/linux-2.4 cvs tree.
> >
> > The patch is on http://www.blazebox.homeip.net/~paul/linux/
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Paul
>
> Sorry, the correct url should be
> http://www.blazebox.homeip.net:81/~paul/linux/
> (damn isp is blocking port 80)
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul
>
For preempt info try here
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/README
Regards,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
|