Thanks. What is the patch marked preempt about? Should I be using that one?
Regards,
Felix
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Blazejowski [mailto:paulb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:56 AM
To: Miro, Felix
Cc: linux-xfs
Subject: Re: Need patch for 2.4.21
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 02:51, Paul Blazejowski wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 14:42, Miro, Felix wrote:
>
> > I'm having difficulty applying the 2.4.19 patch against 2.4.21 source.
Our
> > product offering is going to be based on 2.4.21. We would like to
include
> > XFS in our linux offering. Can you supply an XFS patch based on 2.4.21?
> > The problem I'm having is with files that have significant changes in
2.4.21
> > vs 2.4.19. The 2.4.19 patch doesn't relate at all in those cases.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Felix Miro
> >
>
> You mean the latest preXX? because there is no 2.4.21 just yet...
>
> I have made a diff against the 2.4.21-pre4 source from kernel.org.
> It's from today's CVS but without the kdb v3.0 commits Keith Ownes just
> made...to xfs/linux-2.4 cvs tree.
>
> The patch is on http://www.blazebox.homeip.net/~paul/linux/
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul
Sorry, the correct url should be
http://www.blazebox.homeip.net:81/~paul/linux/
(damn isp is blocking port 80)
Regards,
Paul
|