On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 02:51, Paul Blazejowski wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 14:42, Miro, Felix wrote:
>
> > I'm having difficulty applying the 2.4.19 patch against 2.4.21 source. Our
> > product offering is going to be based on 2.4.21. We would like to include
> > XFS in our linux offering. Can you supply an XFS patch based on 2.4.21?
> > The problem I'm having is with files that have significant changes in 2.4.21
> > vs 2.4.19. The 2.4.19 patch doesn't relate at all in those cases.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Felix Miro
> >
>
> You mean the latest preXX? because there is no 2.4.21 just yet...
>
> I have made a diff against the 2.4.21-pre4 source from kernel.org.
> It's from today's CVS but without the kdb v3.0 commits Keith Ownes just
> made...to xfs/linux-2.4 cvs tree.
>
> The patch is on http://www.blazebox.homeip.net/~paul/linux/
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul
Sorry, the correct url should be
http://www.blazebox.homeip.net:81/~paul/linux/
(damn isp is blocking port 80)
Regards,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
|