xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: system call documentation [license question]

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: system call documentation [license question]
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 11:16:39 -0800
Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher <ag@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Andries.Brouwer@xxxxxx, kaos@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030202155017.GA13373@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1044199525.1372.8.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0302021633280.1441-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030202155017.GA13373@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 04:50:17PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:

> When I wrote man pages I put them onto the same license as most of
> the other man pages are, which roughly says "do what you want, but
> add a changelog for changes and don't remove my name"

what about "do what you want; but don't blame, sue or call me if stuff
breaks" ?

does retention of a name really matter than much to ones ego?


  --cw


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>