xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Yet Another mkfs.xfs RAID Question

To: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Yet Another mkfs.xfs RAID Question
From: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 02 Feb 2003 09:11:55 -0600
Cc: Christian.Guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <yq1lm0zsno1.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030201130427.GA8128@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <yq1lm0zsno1.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 15:20, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Christian" == Christian Guggenberger 
> >>>>> <Christian.Guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> Christian> I'm going to set up a new 1.7 TB HW Raid 5 next week.  RAID
> Christian> 5 contains 11 disks, Stripe Unit should be (according to
> Christian> the manual) 128k.  so my mkfs.xfs options will be
> Christian> sunit=256, swidth=2560 for the data section, won't they?
> 
> Yup.
> 
> 
> Christian> I will definitly use internal log, so I'd like to ask, if I
> Christian> should use logversion 2, and what sunit and swidth values I
> Christian> should use here?  I guess the same as for the data
> Christian> section???
> 
> 128KB log alignment seems a bit of an overkill.
> 
> Does your controller state which chunk size it uses internally?  Most
> controllers use 4-16KB blocks for RAID5.  So try aligning your log to
> values in that neighbourhood.

4K is usually enough to fix performance issues, but it may be dependent
on the underlying raid too.

Steve




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>