xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Another mkfs.xfs RAID Question

To: "Kai Leibrandt" <k_leibrandt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Another mkfs.xfs RAID Question
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxx>
Date: 01 Feb 2003 16:03:01 -0500
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <000001c2c9f0$ced5d750$0500a8c0@Bilbo>
Organization: mkp.net
References: <000001c2c9f0$ced5d750$0500a8c0@Bilbo>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
>>>>> "Kai" == Kai Leibrandt <k_leibrandt@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Kai> Dragos' question about the su,sw options led me to have another
Kai> look at my Mylex RAID setup, and I now am confused too...  My
Kai> RAID controller tells me that the primary RAID volume (a 3-disk
Kai> RAID 5) has a Stripe Size of 64k and a Segment Size of 8k. So for
Kai> this setup should the sunit be set to 64k or to 8k (the segment
Kai> size)??? The manual fo the DAC says that the segment size is the
Kai> preferred io size for caching, but xfs has a preferred io size
Kai> equal to the stripe size - which to choose?

Hmmm.  My guess would be that the Mylex uses 8k hardware sectors
internally and does read/modify/write on those.

Whether the 64K is stripe width or stripe unit, I don't know.

The real answer is the same as always: Try both settings with your
anticipated I/O load and see which one performs better.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen      http://mkp.net/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>