| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE - acl_init |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Feb 2003 13:48:18 -0800 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, agruen@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030220213327.GA804@frodo> |
| References: | <200302182335.h1INZ7la8907219@snort.melbourne.sgi.com> <20030220075926.GA21973@wotan.suse.de> <20030220213327.GA804@frodo> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 08:33:27AM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > Hmmm... just tried running valgrind on xfs_repair and looks like its > going to take a bit of work to get valgrind to work on any of our > tools - we use ustat in libxfs for example, & valgrind barfs on that > as an unrecognised syscall. Does purify work? --cw |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE - acl_init, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - pagebuf, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TAKE - acl_init, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE - acl_init, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |