| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 |
| From: | Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:22:50 +0100 |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 |
Can someone please inform me about something.. The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS directory on the ftp site contains acl-2.0.19, libacl-2.0.19 and libacl-devel-2.0.19. Why? Also, The attr package version is 2.0.11-0 in the installer image but 2.0.12-0 on the ftp site. Again, why? Same name issue exists (attr-devel vs libattr-devel). // Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: prcesses stuck in D state (lock_p), Christian Guggenberger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | Kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:1194, Austin Gonyou |
| Next by Thread: | Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |