| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: linux/fs/xfs/xfs_log.h:_lsn_cmp not declared __inline__ with gcc 2.95 |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 14 Feb 2003 14:28:33 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030214202615.GB25088@f00f.org> |
| Organization: | |
| References: | <20030214201059.GA25006@f00f.org> <1045253892.463.1183.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <20030214202615.GB25088@f00f.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 14:26, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 02:18:12PM -0600, Steve Lord wrote: > > > The way I remember it - 2.95 generated bad code here. > > Which gcc-2.95? Well, thats the problem, there is no way to divine more about the compiler than 2.95, so the code cannot tell. I think the problem came out as recovery failures, or maybe a cpu loop somewhere, I really cannot remember anymore. Steve > > For me, it *seems* to work... if it's not working, what can I expect > to see? Am I silently experincing corruption as I type this? :( > > > Hopefully the compiler will be fixed in the future and the inline > > can be restored. > > Anyone else tested this? > > > --cw -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: linux/fs/xfs/xfs_log.h:_lsn_cmp not declared __inline__ with gcc 2.95, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - Remove unused init_spinlock #define, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: linux/fs/xfs/xfs_log.h:_lsn_cmp not declared __inline__ with gcc 2.95, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: linux/fs/xfs/xfs_log.h:_lsn_cmp not declared __inline__ with gcc 2.95, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |