Just as a side note for everybody.
All the rpm builds and testing for 1.2 was done on RH 8.0 boxes.
So while we are more than willing to accept patches for
earlier version of RH we simply and not tested anything but
8.0.
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 11:28, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 at 11:02pm, Keith Owens wrote
>
> > For some reason, the spec file in xfsprogs is incorrect. It has
> > /usr/local/man/man5/xfs.5
> > when it should be
> > /usr/local/man/man5/xfs.5*
> > the trailing '*' is to cope with gzipped man pages, which RH 7.2 does
> > by default.
> >
> > It looks like a failure in the awk code that builds the spec filelist
> > from the manifest. Until the xfs release team can correct the build
> > process, here is an untested patch to workaround the problem.
>
> Thanks! The patch works for me, i.e. xfsprogs rpmbuilds and the affected
> man pages are in place after installing the rpms produced.
|