xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: su,sw suboptions clarification on fs creation

To: Dragos Delcea <dragos.delcea@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: su,sw suboptions clarification on fs creation
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 30 Jan 2003 10:19:55 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1043935942.6121.32.camel@busybox>
Organization:
References: <1043935942.6121.32.camel@busybox>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 08:12, Dragos Delcea wrote:

> 
> also, does "unwritten=0" helps performance?
> the fs will be used for some datafiles of an oracle test instance (few 
> files, but big ones).
> 

Your other question appears to have been answered, as to this one,
for the moment, unwritten=0 is the default on linux and also the
only supported configuration. Unwritten extent support is a work
in progress still. In general, unwritten=0 will be a little faster.

Steve

-- 

Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>