| To: | Jan Hudec <bulb@xxxxxx>, "Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" <metze@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxx, Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ext2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: default quota limits in linux (via quotactl()) |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Jan 2003 01:40:14 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <20030128093250.GM28513@vagabond> |
| References: | <5.2.0.9.2.20030127150905.0217e170@post.strato.de> <5.2.0.9.2.20030127150905.0217e170@post.strato.de> <5.2.0.9.2.20030128074810.0218c4f8@post.webmailer.de> <20030128093250.GM28513@vagabond> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 10:32:50AM +0100, Jan Hudec wrote: > It still isn't a kernel problem, but a user-space one. You need to > get or write a PAM module, that will check wether quotas are set for > user being authenticated and if not, set them. You could even store > the qutoas in the LDAP (or some other) database and check them when > a user logs in... consider 1 million users where only a small percentage of them will ever write to the fs ... why even store 1 million quota values needlessly at all? surely the argument for a default here isn't a terrible one? --cw |
| Previous by Date: | Re: default quota limits in linux (via quotactl()), Jan Hudec |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: default quota limits in linux (via quotactl()), Jan Hudec |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: default quota limits in linux (via quotactl()), Jan Hudec |
| Next by Thread: | Re: default quota limits in linux (via quotactl()), Jan Hudec |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |