| To: | Dean Roehrich <roehrich@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: dm_handle_to_path |
| From: | James A Goodwin <jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:37:29 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
So are you saying that dm_handle_to_path works now? That would be
excellent news.
-James Goodwin
Software Engineer
IBM Global Services - Federal
jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: (281) 336 2578
Fax: (281) 335 4231
T/L 260-2578
Dean Roehrich
<roehrich@xxxxxxx To: James A
Goodwin/Houston/IBM@IBMUS
> cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: dm_handle_to_path
01/17/2003 11:35
AM
>From: James A Goodwin <jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>
>Dean,
>
>I remember asking about this call before, but I seem to remember that the
>implementation only worked under certain circumstances. Is that still the
>case, or does it really work now? It's still listed in the DMAPI Status
>file as a function that does not work.
I had forgotten about the Status file--it's out of date.
Dean
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: dm_handle_to_path, James A Goodwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | cvs access to oss shut down, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: dm_handle_to_path, James A Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: dm_handle_to_path, Dean Roehrich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |