xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Correct RedHat based XFS 1.2pre4 RPMs available

To: Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Correct RedHat based XFS 1.2pre4 RPMs available
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 07:43:27 +0000
Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1040344583.15731.162.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from florin@xxxxxxx on Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:36:22PM -0800
References: <1040334285.4524.107.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1040344583.15731.162.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:36:22PM -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 13:44, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> > Ok so after fat fingering the SPEC file and using a really old
> > 1.2 patch for the RedHat kernel builds 
> > Everything has be rebuilt and has been pushed out to oss.
> 
> Cool!
> 
> Now, i don't want to be a nitpicker, but is it possible to build these
> things based on the latest RH kernel update? (2.4.18-18.8.0)
> 
> >From what i can tell, usually the drivers, modified kernels and other
> kernel stuff made by third parties, either supports all kernel releases
> with the distribution up to date (messy and difficult), or support only
> the original kernel provided by the initial distribution release + the
> latest update available at the moment of release.

We already support 2.4.18-17.8.0 and 2.4.18-18.8.0 is not that different.
I will update the rpm for 1.2-final, but there are rumours that there will
be new errata kernel from RH soon for the ext3 data=journal issue..


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>