xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs version in 2.4.18-17SGI_XFS_1.2pre4

To: Thomas Bittermann <t.bittermann@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs version in 2.4.18-17SGI_XFS_1.2pre4
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 18 Dec 2002 17:40:33 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200212182234.48190.t.bittermann@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization:
References: <200212182234.48190.t.bittermann@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Doh... 
Ya that looks like  cut-n-past error on my part.

Ok folks ignore the RH kenels for the moment, I'll start the build over
and have the ready sometime tomorrow.
 
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 15:34, Thomas Bittermann wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> hello,
> 
> i found this:
> 
> [...]
> #
> # Patches 990200 to 990299 are for SGI XFS
> #
> 
> Patch990200: linux-2.4.19-xfs-config_stuff-pre2.patch
> Patch990201: linux-2.4.19-xfs-sysctl.patch
> Patch990202: linux-2.4.19-xfs-exports.patch
> #Patch990203: linux-2.4.19-xfs-1.2pre3.patch
> Patch990203: linux-2.4.19-xfs-20020922.patch
> Patch990204: linux-2.4.19-aggressive_readahead.patch
> [...]
> 
> in kernel-2.4.18-17SGI_XFS_1.2pre4.spec file.
> 
> is the right patch included? linux-2.4.19-xfs-20020922 sounds quite 
> old and not like 1.2pre4 ...
> 
> thanks [for this great and reliable fs]
> 
> thomas
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE+AOnn3E3TGgPB70IRAoJaAKCnGHPNtw38QDLo+b+zZO2mWx6aRgCbBmIA
> G913Kz4qa1UVELFAK5hrDoQ=
> =0uyj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>