xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs version in 2.4.18-17SGI_XFS_1.2pre4

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xfs version in 2.4.18-17SGI_XFS_1.2pre4
From: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:51:35 +0100
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020513
Russell Cattelan wrote:
> Doh...
> Ya that looks like  cut-n-past error on my part.
>
> Ok folks ignore the RH kenels for the moment, I'll start the build over
> and have the ready sometime tomorrow.
>
> On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 15:34, Thomas Bittermann wrote:
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>hello,
>>
>>i found this:
>>
>>[...]
>>#
>># Patches 990200 to 990299 are for SGI XFS
>>#
>>
>>Patch990200: linux-2.4.19-xfs-config_stuff-pre2.patch
>>Patch990201: linux-2.4.19-xfs-sysctl.patch
>>Patch990202: linux-2.4.19-xfs-exports.patch
>>#Patch990203: linux-2.4.19-xfs-1.2pre3.patch
>>Patch990203: linux-2.4.19-xfs-20020922.patch
>>Patch990204: linux-2.4.19-aggressive_readahead.patch
>>[...]
>>
>>in kernel-2.4.18-17SGI_XFS_1.2pre4.spec file.
>>
>>is the right patch included? linux-2.4.19-xfs-20020922 sounds quite
>>old and not like 1.2pre4 ...
>>
>>thanks [for this great and reliable fs]
>>
>>thomas
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>>iD8DBQE+AOnn3E3TGgPB70IRAoJaAKCnGHPNtw38QDLo+b+zZO2mWx6aRgCbBmIA
>>G913Kz4qa1UVELFAK5hrDoQ=
>>=0uyj
>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Yay! And I built my XFS DVD with those kernels already :) No problem,
I'll just replace the kernels when they come :)

On a second note (this is to all interested) I've gotten hold of an ftp
that the DVD iso's will be available from shortly. No specifics but it's
got a fat pipe from what I understand :)

// Stefan



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>