xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Bug 202] XFS data corruption

To: Flameeyes <diego_p@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Bug 202] XFS data corruption
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:44:37 -0800
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <n2m-g.b48ddd335d1b9897c73e79a10cccd2ff@flameeyes.is-a-geek.org>
References: <200212140649.gBE6n494022371@oss.sgi.com> <20021214152050.GA17850@tapu.f00f.org> <n2m-g.cb5cb800d10b7b59c0d62c5d7b2ae4af@flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20021216064516.GA23463@tapu.f00f.org> <n2m-g.b48ddd335d1b9897c73e79a10cccd2ff@flameeyes.is-a-geek.org>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:41:40PM +0100, Flameeyes wrote:

> kernel 2.4.20-xfs [with patches from bytesex.org for the bttv
> drivers]

ok

> NVdriver version 1.0-41.91 [released Dec 11 2002]

i'm surpised that's causing problems ... i have a very slightly
different version here i'm using and i don't see it

> I don't know if the corruption depends on this, actually, I'm not
> sure if is a corruption comparable to the one reported in the bug:
> after a power failure, some files in my home folder was "empty" (I
> only tried to cat them).

well, this may *not* be a bug

i think there is confusion as to what the journalling does and what
people can expect from it

i've yet been unable to reproduce a 'bug' as reported


  --cw


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>