| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Do releases have same or different on disk format? |
| From: | "John Haverty" <zeio@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 06 Dec 2002 03:56:25 -0800 |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Do releases have the same or different on disk format? I want to start off
with a RH71 [for reasons out of my control] box and put my own kernel on. Say, I get the snapshot patches for 2.4.20, will this be equivalent if I installed XFS R1.0 on 7.1, then upgrade to 2.4.0+snapshot XFS OR Make my own bootable-CD, using the latest kerel+xfs and utilities, and make the filesystems and say rsync the system I want on there? [this does work, but its more time consuming] Am I losing anything by not using the mkfs from say -current or release 1.2? _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Can I change XFS_NAME?, Stephen Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Do releases have same or different on disk format?, Stephen Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Can I change XFS_NAME?, Sakata |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Do releases have same or different on disk format?, Stephen Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |