xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS trouble (!)

To: Ajay Shekhawat <ajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS trouble (!)
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 13:55:26 +1100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20021130000059.GA18501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from ajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 07:00:59PM -0500
References: <20021130000059.GA18501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 07:00:59PM -0500, Ajay Shekhawat wrote:
> I'm trying to recover an XFS filesystem that might have gotten corrupted
> due to a bad RAID controller. The system is running Linux kernel v2.4.19
> with the associated XFS patches. It was originally running 2.4.17 with the
> XFS patches. It is a fairly big filesystem (about 1TB).
> On boot, the OS refuses to mount it: says bad superblock.

Can you send (cut & paste) the exact error message from your
system logs?  This will show exactly which point in the XFS
mount code an error is being flagged.  -- thanks.

> "xfs_repair -n" didn't offer to do much either (it didn't complain loudly
> about the inodes or something), and I didn't run xfs_repair without the
> "-n" for fear of trashing the whole thing.

Its strange that xfs_repair is unable to detect any problem
but the mount is failing - the kernel mount path basically does
a simplified version of the consistency checks that xfs_repair
does; so if mount says the SB is bogus, repair should notice
it too.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>