xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs performance on scsi in 2.4.20-rc1

To: Robert Sander <gurubert-dated-1037438228.gonjfdnb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs performance on scsi in 2.4.20-rc1
From: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 17 Nov 2002 07:25:24 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <news2mail-slrnatc3mq.9gm.gurubert-dated-1037438228.gonjfdnb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1037393245.24118.43.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <news2mail-slrnatc3mq.9gm.gurubert-dated-1037438228.gonjfdnb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 03:24, Robert Sander wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:48:21 +0000 (UTC),
>  Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > It turns out that there are some issues in the scsi mid layer code
> > which are killing xfs performance - if you are not running a HIGHMEM
> > kernel. So if you are running 2.4.20-rc1 with xfs on scsi without
> > HIGHMEM and HIGHIO turned on, then I recommend you turn them on.
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Is this related to bug 193?
> 
> http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193

No, bug 193 is a memory problem in the attribute code, an address being
passed to vfree which should not be is what it looks like, but I am
leaving that upto other folks to look at right now.

Steve

-- 
Stephen  Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>