| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfsdump stuck in io_schedule |
| From: | Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:36:27 +0100 |
| Cc: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20021116205942.GA32365@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Chris Wedgwood's message of "Sat, 16 Nov 2002 12:59:42 -0800") |
| References: | <dnfzu3yw8u.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021115135233.A13882@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dnlm3v9ebk.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021115140635.A31836@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dnr8dmj1i1.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3DD57602.857AD62D@xxxxxxxxx> <87zns9xwtk.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021116205942.GA32365@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | zlatko.calusic@xxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter, i386-debian-linux) |
Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> [xfs_bulkstat+2123/2824] xfs_bulkstat+0x84b/0xb08 > [...] >> [xfs_inactive_free_eofblocks+176/548] xfs_inactive_free_eofblocks+0xb0/0x224 > > I cant see how those can both be in the same call path. Have you > tried without preempt? I wondered if that might aggregate things? > All my kernels are already without preempt. -- Zlatko |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 2.5.47 XFS over MD RAID-0 broken, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 195] xfs_fsr results in oops, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfsdump stuck in io_schedule, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfsdump stuck in io_schedule, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |