xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Question about kernel update

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Question about kernel update
From: "Joe St.Clair" <ksimach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 07:11:22 -0500
Organization: KSI Machine & Engineering
References: <3DC0371E.50908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3DC03A72.9060800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3DC05699.8010206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1036015245.18972.23.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx s.sgi.com> <1036015835.20833.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3DC18C35.1030 701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3DC18FDB.3070501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1036098522.1604.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3DC1A543.80606@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1036103789.1657.23.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: ksimach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020523
Eric, I have both the SGI_XFS 17.7.x kernal and the 17.7.x Kernel for RedHat 7.1. When I check for dependencies of the RedHat kernel all seem ok. When I check for dependencies on the SGI built kernel I recieve the following warnings on either the kernel and/or the command tools.
---------------------------
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)
perl(strict)
LATEXFILE
/opt/cpg/bin/do-mgp
---------------------------
I can get rebuild all of the SGI_XFS command tools from SRPMS and they will check ok. But when I attempt to build the kernel from SGI_XFS source I am informed I need gcc >= 2.96-98, my current version is gcc-2.96-85.

I assume (quite possibly incorrectly) that if I update gcc then I should be able to continue with the build. As gcc has been updated (via RedHat up2date) at least once, I assume that it could be updated again. Am I incorrect in this?
Would it be better if I was to rebuild the gcc update on my current system?



Eric Sandeen wrote:

Ok, I'm pretty confused by this.  :)

The only difference I see between the "stock" kernel spec files for
17.7.x and 17.8.0 is:

-%define release 17.7.x
+%define release 17.8.0

(i.e. no gcc differences)

and the only differences between the 17.?.? Red Hat specfiles, and our
specfile, (aside from the release name) are the XFS patches.

I see "BuildRequires: gcc >= 2.96-98" in the 17.7.x specfiles as well,
but I only see gcc-2.96-85 for RH 7.1, so I don't know how you're
supposed to rebuild it on 7.1, or why you seem to be able to.

So I'm stumped.  :)

-Eric




--
Joseph St.Clair - KSI Machine & Engineering




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>