| To: | Robert Sander <gurubert-dated-1037438228.gonjfdnb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs performance on scsi in 2.4.20-rc1 |
| From: | Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 17 Nov 2002 07:25:24 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <news2mail-slrnatc3mq.9gm.gurubert-dated-1037438228.gonjfdnb@raman.epigenomics.epi> |
| References: | <1037393245.24118.43.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <news2mail-slrnatc3mq.9gm.gurubert-dated-1037438228.gonjfdnb@raman.epigenomics.epi> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 03:24, Robert Sander wrote: > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:48:21 +0000 (UTC), > Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > It turns out that there are some issues in the scsi mid layer code > > which are killing xfs performance - if you are not running a HIGHMEM > > kernel. So if you are running 2.4.20-rc1 with xfs on scsi without > > HIGHMEM and HIGHIO turned on, then I recommend you turn them on. > > Hi! > > Is this related to bug 193? > > http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193 No, bug 193 is a memory problem in the attribute code, an address being passed to vfree which should not be is what it looks like, but I am leaving that upto other folks to look at right now. Steve -- Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.5.47 XFS over MD RAID-0 broken, Stephen Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfsdump stuck in io_schedule, Stephen Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs performance on scsi in 2.4.20-rc1, Robert Sander |
| Next by Thread: | PostgreSQL and file system level backup, Murthy Kambhampaty |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |