| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfsdump stuck in io_schedule |
| From: | Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:07:57 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021115112134.GA27856@tapu.f00f.org> (Chris Wedgwood's message of "Fri, 15 Nov 2002 03:21:34 -0800") |
| References: | <dnfzu3yw8u.fsf@magla.zg.iskon.hr> <20021115112134.GA27856@tapu.f00f.org> |
| Reply-to: | zlatko.calusic@xxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter, i386-debian-linux) |
Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > I too had (have?) this problem. > > I tried to reproduce it with CVS of late (last three days) and so far > haven't been able to. I'm now running kdb kernels though in the hope > to get something useful when it does happen. > > I'd love to know *why* I can't make this happen anymore (or why it's > harder to hit) as I didn't see anything relevant fixed as best as I > can tell. What kernel do you use? > > Does it still happen for you with a kernel compile from CVS? Hm, before answering that, I'll need a little help to compile kernel with xfs from cvs. How do i proceed, get everything from cvs and put instead of in-kernel tree? I thought 2.5 follows cvs, is that true? Or are we speaking just about last few days worth of work which is in cvs but not yet synced to Linus kernel tree? Thanks for your reply. -- Zlatko |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfsdump stuck in io_schedule, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfsdump stuck in io_schedule, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfsdump stuck in io_schedule, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfsdump stuck in io_schedule, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |