| To: | tom wang <wddi_1976@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: the cvs kernel oops !! |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:17:19 +0000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021112102715.57735.qmail@web15205.mail.bjs.yahoo.com>; from wddi_1976@yahoo.com.cn on Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 06:27:15PM +0800 |
| References: | <20021112102715.57735.qmail@web15205.mail.bjs.yahoo.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 06:27:15PM +0800, tom wang wrote: > fsstress is the program provided in xfstest package. > the kernel I used is now cvs kernel. > > the oops is easy reproduce, so maybe you can fix it I could reproduce it here, too. The trace I got made no sense at all, though and when I put in a bunch of debug printks I got a very different oops output. After fixing the unchecked malloc today I couldn't reproduce it anymore. Can you please test the latest CVS tree? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: the cvs kernel oops !!, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: v2 vs v1 logs - number of transactions in log?, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: the cvs kernel oops !!, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: the cvs kernel oops !!, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |