| To: | Ragnar@xxxxxxxx, Kj@xxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: performance over multiple disks |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:47:03 -0800 |
| Cc: | James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20021031204233.Q30076@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210311039310.21908-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021031204233.Q30076@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 08:42:33PM +0100, Ragnar Kj?rstad wrote: > If you do the same calculations when multiple operations are going > on at the same time you'll find that if you're reading 10 files from > 10 disks it's going to be a lot quicker if the files are _not_ > spread out. More disks -> more heads -> lower average seek time. If you experiment with this, you'll find eads over multiple disks and stripping is almost *always* faster. RAID4/RAID5 will have slower writes obviously though. --cw |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: performance over multiple disks, Ragnar Kjørstad |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Question about kernel update, Joe St.Clair |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: performance over multiple disks, Ragnar Kjørstad |
| Next by Thread: | Re: performance over multiple disks, Ragnar Kjørstad |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |