xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs_syncsub() question

To: lord@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xfs_syncsub() question
From: ASANO Masahiro <masano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:08:46 +0900 (JST)
Cc: sandeen@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1035840317.2570.512.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210272201530.26558-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1035840317.2570.512.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

Thank you for comments.

> On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 22:05, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Hi, I'll have to look a bit more closely... but your patch does look 
> > correct.
> > Back in 2000 (v. 1.279), it was as you suggest, but Steve changed it.
> > :) Steve?
> 
> I no longer remember the why of this change, I think we can just revert
> to this code.

Ok, I'm waiting someone commit the code. :)
Because it seems possibly critical if it is called at umount.

--
Masano


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>