[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Little questions

To: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Little questions
From: yoros@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 23:30:18 +0100
In-reply-to: <20021029195735.GC5708@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20021027214706.GA5589@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1035817834.18751.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021028225113.GA12476@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021029195735.GC5708@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:57:35AM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:51:13PM +0100, yoros@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Yes, I know that the files I'm deleting has a lot of extents but I
> > also know that other filesystems are faster deleting files.
> It really depends.  For large files, XFS is *much* faster than
> anythiny else presently available for Linux.

When a file is very fragmented... ext2 only have to remove a few blocks
(inode, simple-indirect, double-indirect, etc...). This is the historic
Tanembaum's standard and a lot of UNIX-filesystems implemented this
methods in the past.


Pedro Martinez Juliá
\  yoros@xxxxxxxx
)|    yoros@xxxxxxxxxx
/        http://yoros.cjb.net
Socio HispaLinux #311
Usuario Linux #275438 - http://counter.li.org
GnuPG public information:  pub  1024D/74F1D3AC
Key fingerprint = 8431 7B47 D2B4 5A46 5F8E  534F 588B E285 74F1 D3AC

Attachment: pgpQLSQufSYHs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>