| To: | Fabien Combernous <fcombernous@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [reiserfs-list] To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II. |
| From: | Oleg Drokin <green@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:48:04 +0400 |
| Cc: | ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion <jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, reiserfs <reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3DB823AA.6010405@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3DB823AA.6010405@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
Hello!
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:45:30PM +0200, Fabien Combernous wrote:
> +------------------+-----+------+-----+----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | NFS | Y | Y | Y | Y | nfs works on all of them.
> You need at least reiserfs v3.6.
NFS will work with reiserfs v3.5 too, just there is a probability of having
problems with reusing object ids (and therefore the inode numbers too).
> |data journal | N | Y | N | N | Only ext3 can take care of
> data by a data journal. All other journaled |
> | | | | | | file systems have "only" a
> metadata journal. |
No. Chris Mason have set of patches that implement data journaling for reiserfs,
too.
Bye,
Oleg
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Little questions, yoros |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | xfs_syncsub() question, ASANO Masahiro |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [reiserfs-list] To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II., Nikita Danilov |
| Next by Thread: | Curious about mount options and Direct IO., Austin Gonyou |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |