| To: | yoros@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: About removing files |
| From: | Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:25:52 -0400 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20021024220639.GA20279@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1035497418.31455.13.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021024225614.GA20660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021024231656.GA19254@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021025051820.GA22414@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3DB92B1E.2010807@xxxxxxxxx> <20021025171344.GA21159@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020813 |
yoros@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: I never said that XFS is slower than other FS ;). I just said that it spent a lot of time to delete three files. Now I know a bit more about the utilities (xfs_bmap & xfs_fsr) and take more care with files by looking their extents. Sorry if I am a little heavy... When a file is downoaded from internet it is written to disk in small blocks, may it be a problem?
It depends on the speed of the download and the way in which the
software does the file writes. XFS does some pre-allocation of disk
space when you first open the file and as you write to it. This
space is released as things get closed. I am not that sure of how
this works anymore (my brain FIFO has looped a few times too many)
--
Michael Sinz -- Director, Systems Engineering -- Worldgate Communications
A master's secrets are only as good as
the master's ability to explain them to others.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: About removing files, yoros |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Here is the results of my last question..., yoros |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: About removing files, yoros |
| Next by Thread: | Re: About removing files, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |