xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: About BUG #180

To: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: About BUG #180
From: yoros@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:23:32 +0200
In-reply-to: <20021019081435.C312126@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20021018172002.GA7770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1034963715.8442.45.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021018181252.GA8295@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021019081435.C312126@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 08:14:35AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 08:12:52PM +0200, yoros@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:55:15PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > > Pedro - so, are you saying that it fails immediately after you run
> > > find+attr, but it works if you wait for everything to get on-disk?
> > 
> > I can't be 100% sure of it, but in a few experiences, the more I wait,
> > the less marked files are selected. I tried to umount and mount again
> > and it seems to work well. This two reasons makes me think that xfsdump
> > don't show in the information that is in journal or something like it.
> > Ah, I tried to run "sync; sync; sync;" after xfsdump but don't work.
> 
> You mean before xfsdump, right?  (not after).

Yes. I was trying to say: "running sync and after that, run xfsdump".

Pedro

-- 
Pedro Martinez Juliá
\  yoros@xxxxxxxx
)|    yoros@xxxxxxxxxx
/        http://yoros.cjb.net
Socio HispaLinux #311
Usuario Linux #275438 - http://counter.li.org
GnuPG public information:  pub  1024D/74F1D3AC
Key fingerprint = 8431 7B47 D2B4 5A46 5F8E  534F 588B E285 74F1 D3AC

Attachment: pgplpAf2KKft2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>