XFS ACLs + Ted's EXT2/EXT3 ACLs in 2.5.43?

[Nicholas Wourms <nwourms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I'm probably barking up the wrong tree, but I was wondering 
if there were any issues that would prevent Ted's ext ACLs 
from co-existing with XFS's ACLs.  My base kernel is 2.5.43 
checked out from the XFS cvs tree as of this afternoon. 
Ted's patches went in pretty cleanly [required cleaning the 
fs/config.{help|in} for dupes] except for one part in 
include/linux/fs.h:
He has assigned the bitvector (1<<16) to the macro 
MS_POSIXACL whereas you have assigned an explicit value. 
Will it cause problems for XFS's ACLs if I replace the 
explicit value with the bitvector?  Or is this just 32bit vs 
64bit stuff I need not worry about (since I'm on ia32)?
Cheers,
Nicholas