| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: to compare journalised file systems |
| From: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:06:51 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <1034805191.1461.75.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-copies-to: | nobody |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20021016203853.GH27982@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210161738120.5976-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021016214759.GI27982@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1034805191.1461.75.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 04:53:10PM -0500, Stephen Lord wrote: > > Not to mention that chattr gets into the filesystem via an ext2 > ioctl call. this is true, im not sure what reiserfs did, probably they just implemented this ioctl. ideally there should probably be a standardized and generic call for inode flags like this, but since not just implementing the ext2 ioctl is fine. (chattr does not check for ext2 it just calls the ioctl and if the fs doesn't support it the user gets `not a typewriter'). -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: to compare journalised file systems, Stephen Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: to compare journalised file systems, Stephen C. Tweedie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: to compare journalised file systems, Stephen Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: to compare journalised file systems, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |