xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: to compare journalised file systems

To: Olaf Fr±czyk <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: to compare journalised file systems
From: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:25:54 +0200
Cc: Fabien Combernous <fcombernous@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: Sauter AG, Basel
References: <3DAD2783.1070506@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1034760165.3017.5.camel@venus>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Olaf Fr±czyk schrieb:
> 
> On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 10:46, Fabien Combernous wrote:
> > Lo,
> >
> > Actualy i'm looking for documents about journalised file system, in
> > order to be able to compare them self. I need accurate information if i
> > want to make a good study.
> >
> > Thoses informations have to permit me to get answer about table like this :
> >
> >   Features \ fs    | xfs | ext3 | jfs | reiserfs |
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > chattr            |  ?  |  Y   |  ?  |    ?     |
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > quotas            |  Y  |  ?   |  Y  |    ?     |
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > removable fs      |  ?  |  ?   |  N  |    ?     |
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > NFS               |  Y  |  Y   |  ?  |    ?     |
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > samba             |  ?  |  ?   |  ?  |    ?     |
> > -------------------------------------------------
> Is samba dependent on filesystem?
> I have been using XFS and samba for about 1.5-2 years with no problems.

Since Samba is userspace, the fs shouldn't matter. On the other side
Samba can make use of fs features like ACLs so the fs isn't totally
irrelevant.

Simon

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Olaf


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>