xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [2.4.18-14SGI_XFS_1.2a1] acl problems

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [2.4.18-14SGI_XFS_1.2a1] acl problems
From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:56:44 +0200
Cc: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1034700741.7978.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20021011010713.GA4254@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021011014047.GA27651@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021011020437.GA1144622@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021011211538.GA27574@xxxxxxx> <20021011010713.GA4254@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1034370565.14233.33.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021012153026.GA17332@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021012204316.GP13549@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1034700741.7978.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:52:20AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Ok, here's a patch that seems to take care of all the problems...  I am
> not an acl-guru by -any- means though, so I'd appreciate any testing &
> sanity-checking.  I'll ask the sgi acl-gurus to look at it as well.

The small testcase I scripted does well on it (1.2pre1 with your patch). Not
only the permissions bit seem to be fine now, but also the ghost-acl entries
are gone.

> (I'm not very happy with the test -x fix, it seems like this should be
> much earlier - perhaps even the vfs could just take care of this for
> us...)

Definitely makes me happy! ;)

Thanks, Axel.
-- 
Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>