| To: | Alp ATICI <atici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Work Items |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 13 Oct 2002 13:29:34 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210121124180.26350-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from atici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 11:36:15AM -0400 |
| References: | <20021012135641.B16453@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210121124180.26350-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 11:36:15AM -0400, Alp ATICI wrote: > Now are these restrictions going to be released after the latest 2.5 > kernel (that includes Peter Chubb's 64-bit patches that removes 2TB > limit)? or that doesn't mean Linux VFS supports 64 bit inodes still? As said above Linux VFS can't cope with 64bit inodes still. Also most userspace (not only on Linux) can' cope with > 32bt inodes at all, thus is why XFS has a 32bit inodes option on IRIX now, too |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | artwork-redhat installer, Pablo Hdez |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 1.2 PreRelease avaliable, ctooley |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Work Items, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | re[2]: Work Items, Greg Freemyer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |