Re: Work Items

xfs

Re: Work Items

To:	Alp ATICI <atici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: Work Items
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 12 Oct 2002 13:56:41 +0100
Cc:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0210111815360.31020-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from atici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 06:19:14PM -0400
References:	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0210111815360.31020-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 06:19:14PM -0400, Alp ATICI wrote:
> Hi ,
> 
> I was checking out the "work items" under SGI XFS site, and
> it hasn't been updated for a long time. Now that 2.5.42 addressed
> 2 TB limit, would XFS have 64 bit inodes

XFS does have 64bit inodes, Linux VFS doesn't.

> IRIX)? What about the other items that appear as "code complete in CVS"?
> Are they merged with 2.5 kernel?

Yes.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Work Items, Alp ATICI Re: Work Items, Christoph Hellwig <= Re: Work Items, Alp ATICI Re: Work Items, Eric Sandeen Re: Work Items, Andi Kleen Re: Work Items, Stephen Lord Re: Work Items, Andi Kleen Re: Work Items, Christoph Hellwig re[2]: Work Items, Greg Freemyer Re: re[2]: Work Items, Steve Lord

Previous by Date:	Re: XFS 1.2Pre and nfs problem, Þeref Tufan Þen
Next by Date:	Re: [2.4.18-14SGI_XFS_1.2a1] acl problems (was: root xfs filesystem executable bits bug comeback?), Axel Thimm
Previous by Thread:	Work Items, Alp ATICI
Next by Thread:	Re: Work Items, Alp ATICI
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]