On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 21:08, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> This sounds very much like my problem from a few weeks ago.
And your solution was? Or was it something which got written
> On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 20:35, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Federico Sevilla III wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > After another reboot I did an xfs_check on the yet-unrecovered
> > > /dev/sda10 and I did not get any messages. An attempt to mount it
> > > succeeded. I unmounted /dev/sda10 and did another xfs_check and
> > again I
> > > did not get any messages, which from the manual page I've
> > interpreted as
> > > "clean". Because /dev/sda10 was finally unmounted properly the next
> > > reboot worked and our server is back online.
> > Odd. Just to make sure I read everything right - xfs itself was
> > hanging
> > in recovery, and your oopses came from when you tried to sync with
> > SysRq?
> > And then it sounds like the only thing you did before the mount was
> > ultimately successful, was to run xfs_check... which should be a
> > read-only
> > test, and should not have changed anything about the fs, as far as I
> > know.
> > I think the most helpful thing (in retrospect) would have been to
> > break into kdb, and see where mount was stuck during recovery.
> > I'm not sure what to make of this problem...
> > -Eric
> Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Coremetrics, Inc.