xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

TAKE - One more place where we should use d_alloc_anon

To: undisclosed-recipients:;;@lab343.munich.sgi.com
Subject: TAKE - One more place where we should use d_alloc_anon
From: hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 21:58:22 +0200
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
This one wasn't converted in early 2.5 when the others were.
Don't ask me why..


Date:  Wed Oct  2 12:58:14 PDT 2002
Workarea:  lab343.munich.sgi.com:/home/hch/repo/slinx/2.5.x-xfs

The following file(s) were checked into:
  bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.5.x-xfs


Modid:  2.5.x-xfs:slinx:128909a
linux/fs/xfs/dmapi/dmapi_register.c - 1.19
        - Use d_alloc_anon in dm_open_by_handle_rvp instead of open-coding.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • TAKE - One more place where we should use d_alloc_anon, hch <=