| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | xfs_syncsub() question |
| From: | ASANO Masahiro <masano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:47:09 +0900 (JST) |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi,
I have a question.
Why don't we sync the last xfs_inode in xfs_syncsub()?
I am wondering if the condition check is wrong... (see below)
--
Masano
--- linux/fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c Thu Oct 24 07:46:17 2002
+++ linux/fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c.new Mon Oct 28 11:29:21 2002
@@ -1433,7 +1433,7 @@
ASSERT(ipointer_in == B_FALSE);
ip = ip->i_mnext;
- } while (ip->i_mnext != mp->m_inodes);
+ } while (ip != mp->m_inodes);
XFS_MOUNT_IUNLOCK(mp);
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [reiserfs-list] To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II., Oleg Drokin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | linvfs_get_dentry patch for 2.5.44, Kazuhisa TAKEI |
| Previous by Thread: | Little questions, yoros |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs_syncsub() question, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |