xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [reiserfs-list] To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II.

To: Fabien Combernous <fcombernous@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II.
From: Oleg Drokin <green@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:48:04 +0400
Cc: ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion <jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, reiserfs <reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3DB823AA.6010405@eprocess.fr>
References: <3DB823AA.6010405@eprocess.fr>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i
Hello!

On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:45:30PM +0200, Fabien Combernous wrote:
> +------------------+-----+------+-----+----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | NFS              |  Y  |  Y   |  Y  |    Y     | nfs works on all of them. 
> You need at least reiserfs v3.6.

NFS will work with reiserfs v3.5 too, just there is a probability of having 
problems with reusing object ids (and therefore the inode numbers too).
 
> |data journal      |  N  |  Y   |  N  |    N     | Only ext3 can take care of 
> data by a data journal. All other journaled |
> |                  |     |      |     |          | file systems have "only" a 
> metadata journal.                           |

No. Chris Mason have set of patches that implement data journaling for reiserfs,
too.

Bye,
    Oleg


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>