On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 11:25, Simon Matter wrote:
> Olaf Fr±czyk schrieb:
> >
> > On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 10:46, Fabien Combernous wrote:
> > > Lo,
> > >
> > > Actualy i'm looking for documents about journalised file system, in
> > > order to be able to compare them self. I need accurate information if i
> > > want to make a good study.
> > >
> > > Thoses informations have to permit me to get answer about table like this
> > > :
> > >
> > > Features \ fs | xfs | ext3 | jfs | reiserfs |
> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > > chattr | ? | Y | ? | ? |
> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > > quotas | Y | ? | Y | ? |
> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > > removable fs | ? | ? | N | ? |
> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > > NFS | Y | Y | ? | ? |
> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > > samba | ? | ? | ? | ? |
> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > Is samba dependent on filesystem?
> > I have been using XFS and samba for about 1.5-2 years with no problems.
>
> Since Samba is userspace, the fs shouldn't matter. On the other side
> Samba can make use of fs features like ACLs so the fs isn't totally
> irrelevant.
Yes. Since 2.2.5 (or.4) DACLs work with samba.(There is a small problem:
DACL rwx gives you for samba for created files and directories rwx, but
on unix side using 'touch' gives rwx for directories and rw- for files).
There is also an idea to move DOS attributes :System,Hidden,Read-Only,
Archived to EAs in XFS. This should give you much cleaner permissions,
as they are now mapped into normal user/group/other permissions.
Regards,
Olaf
|