xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Question about kernel update

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Question about kernel update
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 23:09:00 +0000
Cc: ksimach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1036103789.1657.23.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com>; from sandeen@sgi.com on Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 04:36:29PM -0600
References: <3DC0371E.50908@ksimachine.com> <3DC03A72.9060800@koschikode.com> <3DC05699.8010206@ksimachine.com> <1036015245.18972.23.camel@stout.america <1036015835.20833.25.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> <3DC18C35.1030 <3DC18FDB.3070501@ksimachine.com> <1036098522.1604.11.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> <3DC1A543.80606@ksimachine.com> <1036103789.1657.23.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 04:36:29PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> I see "BuildRequires: gcc >= 2.96-98" in the 17.7.x specfiles as well,
> but I only see gcc-2.96-85 for RH 7.1, so I don't know how you're
> supposed to rebuild it on 7.1, or why you seem to be able to.
> 
> So I'm stumped.  :)

It's most likey a gcc bug.  Could those who saw it with the latest
errata gcc (i.e. not with the out-of-date one like me) fill a bugreport
at redhat's bugzilla (for gcc, not the kernel! :)) and post the url
to the bug here?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>