| To: | christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs locking -- stack dump |
| From: | Luben Tuikov <luben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:41:30 -0400 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | Splentec Ltd. |
| References: | <3DB92CAF.775874FA@splentec.com> <20021025131946.GB16970@pc9391.physik.uni-regensburg.de> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> just curios, why are using lvm-1.1rc2?
>
> I thought the 1.1 series are very buggy and abandoned?
> I've read this some time ago on the lvm Homepage but for now I can't find
> that article again...
Which one should I use? The default with the kernel (2.4.19)
or lvm-2.1.95.10 or lvm-2.0-{latest or beta}?
--
Luben
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs locking -- stack dump, christian . guggenberger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS (CVS release) problem: mkfs.xfs failed on hppa, jsoe0708 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs locking -- stack dump, christian . guggenberger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs locking -- stack dump, christian . guggenberger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |