| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Curious about mount options and Direct IO. |
| From: | Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 24 Oct 2002 15:10:18 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021024200521.GA17994@tapu.f00f.org> |
| References: | <20021024200521.GA17994@tapu.f00f.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 15:05, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:59:12PM -0500, Austin Gonyou wrote: > > > What benefits, if any, would we see by using direct IO with XFS on > > very large FS?(like 300 and 500GB FS) > > It depends what you are doing... I agree, but I guess my question was a general question about XFS's capabilities to actually do anything in a DIO mode.I didn't see any mount options for DirectIO, just osyncisdsync. Our app is Oracle, but I can't see that anything will really benefit beyond relieving the logging(logbufs=8). > > --cw |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Curious about mount options and Direct IO., Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - Implement xfs_panic_mask, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Curious about mount options and Direct IO., Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Curious about mount options and Direct IO., Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |