xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs_fsr broken again?

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xfs_fsr broken again?
From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 00:06:15 -0800
In-reply-to: <20021008094316.A4351@pc9391.uni-regensburg.de>
Mail-copies-to: nobody
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20021008065719.GA999@psychedelic.baana.suomi.net> <20021008094316.A4351@pc9391.uni-regensburg.de>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:43:16AM +0200, Christian Guggenberger wrote:
> On 08 Oct 2002 08:57:19 Juha K Kallio wrote:
> >Sorry, I just noticed that xfs_fsr was in xfsdump, not in xfsprogs. So
> >that should be it. But I ran into another problem when updating
> >everything: I made a Debian package of attr with debuild, and it made a
> >very nice symlink /usr/lib/libattr.so -> /. The real lib seems to be
> >missing from /usr/lib.
> >
> Hi,
> 
> I have the same problems here on my debian/unstable box. According to 
> Nathan Scott the builds are fine on his box... maybe Nathan should check 
> again?!
> But I can build proper packages on a debian woody system....
> 
> But you can use the latest xfsprogs, xfsdump and attr binary packages from 
> debian/unstable, they contain the fixes Eric checked in last week.

what does /bin/sh point to on your box?  this smells like evil
bashisms in the xfsprogs build system, this would not show up on boxes
using BloAtedSH as /bin/sh but would on boxes using a more purly posix
shell such as debian's ash.

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgps2eRez5pJT.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>