| To: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RedHat 8.0 and XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)) |
| From: | Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:56:55 +0200 |
| Cc: | Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bill Anderson <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Linux XFS (SGI)" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20021002115719.C1780-100000@xs1.xs4all.nl>; from knuffie@xs4all.nl on Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:58:12AM +0200 |
| References: | <3D9A838F.8260B8AD@ch.sauter-bc.com> <20021002115719.C1780-100000@xs1.xs4all.nl> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:58:12AM +0200, Seth Mos wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Simon Matter wrote: > > Bill Anderson schrieb: > > > > > > On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 14:38, Florin Andrei wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 14:47, Ravi Wijayaratne wrote: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74170 > The bug is CLOSED and DEFERRED. This is ugly. People will be banging SGI's doors for a RedHat installer again, and I could very well understand, that they wouldn't want to go through that again and drop supporting XFS installers/anaconda for RedHat. After all the SGI-XFS people should concentrate on kernel matters, not on anaconda. > > I'm looking forward to 8.1 :) > I think they really don't want to :-) So people using XFS and RedHat in production will have to stay with 7.3 unless SGI guys sacrifice their time again (for my personal benefit, I admit that I hope they will). :( -- Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - fix 2.5 kdb, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RedHat 8.0 and XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)), Theo Van Dinter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Begging :^), Chris Tooley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RedHat 8.0 and XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)), Simon Matter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |