xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: the shell will make the xfs fs locked

To: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: the shell will make the xfs fs locked
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 03:49:57 +0200
Cc: tom wang <wddi_1976@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1033609242.1051.7.camel@laptop.americas.sgi.com>
References: <20021003012732.63796.qmail@web15212.mail.bjs.yahoo.com> <1033609242.1051.7.camel@laptop.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:40:40PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 20:27, tom wang wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Hope you will be soon fix this problem.
> > because we are now testing xfs filesystem and 
> > decide wether use xfs as the file server in our 
> > product.
> 
> The particular scenario you are testing created 64K
> extents in a file before it died here. What you are
> doing here does not bear a lot of resemblance to
> any reasonable application I can think of.
> 
> As Eric said, this is not a simple thing to fix, and
> probably not something which will get fixed completely
> for a while.

It still looks like a kind of security/DoS problem. Is there a simple
way to check for the condition and -EINVAL or EIO in this case at least ? 

-Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>